Space Tech / IoT

🔥 A 50-Cent Bluetooth Chip Can Now Phone Home From Space — and It Just Made Hubble Network Worth $1.6 Billion

Hubble Network raised $200M at a $1.6B valuation to connect standard, sub-50-cent Bluetooth chips directly to satellites — no SIM, no tower, no new radio.

A 50-Cent Bluetooth Chip Can Now Phone Home From Space — and It Just Made Hubble Network Worth $1.6 Billion — Tech Arcade
Photo: Harrison Broadbent / Unsplash

The Bluetooth chip in your earbuds, your luggage tag, your kid’s backpack tracker — it was designed to whisper across a living room, maybe 30 feet on a good day. Hubble Network just convinced it to shout at a satellite orbiting 400 miles overhead. And investors like the sound of it.

Let’s get the number on the table first: $200 million. That’s the Series C the Seattle startup just closed, at a $1.6 billion valuation, led by Keith Block’s Smith Point Capital — the same Keith Block who used to be co-CEO of Salesforce (GeekWire). It brings Hubble’s total funding to $300 million and roughly doubles the valuation it carried after its $70 million Series B a year ago (Payload).

Here’s the part that makes engineers argue: the chips doing the talking cost under 50 cents, run on standard Bluetooth Low Energy, and reach orbit after nothing more than a firmware update (Business Wire).

The thesis is simple: if a half-dollar chip can reach space, the map of what’s worth tracking gets a lot bigger.

đź§  Why This Matters

There are billions of things worth knowing the location of — shipping pallets, gas meters, cattle, cold-chain vaccine boxes, construction gear — and almost none of them get tracked, because the economics never worked. A cellular modem plus a data plan costs real money and needs a tower nearby. Traditional satellite modems cost even more. So the objects go dark the moment they leave a warehouse.

Hubble’s pitch flips the cost structure. It says its approach is roughly 10x cheaper than a cellular modem and 50x cheaper than a satellite modem, using a chip most manufacturers already have on the shelf (Business Wire). No SIM card, no tower, no custom radio. That’s the difference between tracking your top 5% of high-value assets and tracking everything.

“When we said we’d connect Bluetooth chips to satellites, most said physics wouldn’t allow it. Today we’re turning that early skepticism into a global opportunity.” — Alex Haro, CEO and co-founder, Hubble Network

Haro isn’t a first-timer. He co-founded Life360, the family-location app now used by tens of millions. His CTO, Ben Wild, invented Amazon Sidewalk — the low-power mesh network baked into Echo devices (GeekWire). This is a team that has shipped low-power connectivity at scale before.

📊 Deep Dive

The trick is what the industry calls “direct-to-satellite,” but Hubble does it with a twist. Instead of streaming data, a Bluetooth chip fires off tiny bursts — a location ping, a temperature reading — that a satellite can pick out from orbit. Founded in 2021, the company now runs 6 satellites in low-Earth orbit and plans a 60-satellite constellation by 2030, built with satellite-maker Muon Space (Payload). This round marks the switch from closed beta to general availability — meaning any Bluetooth device can now, in theory, opt in.

How it stacks up against the ways things get connected today:

  • Hubble (Bluetooth-to-satellite): chip under $0.50, works via firmware update, global coverage, tiny data bursts.
  • Cellular IoT modem: roughly 10x the chip cost, needs a data plan and nearby tower coverage.
  • Traditional satellite modem: roughly 50x the chip cost, bulky, power-hungry, expensive per message.
  • Phone-focused direct-to-cell (Apple/Globalstar, Starlink): built for texting from smartphones in dead zones, not half-dollar sensors on a shipping crate.

The company also leans on a hybrid model: a ground network of 100 million-plus Bluetooth gateways across 170 countries handles devices near civilization, while the satellites cover the roughly 3 million square miles where nothing else reaches (Business Wire). Hubble says more than 500,000 devices are already active, with paying pilots including fleet-tech firm Samsara, plus chipmakers Texas Instruments and InPlay on board.

“Hubble gives us a way to extend visibility beyond the reach of traditional networks.” — David Gal, VP of Product and Engineering, Samsara

⚠️ The Catch

Six satellites is not a global always-on network. With a constellation that small, a device on the ground might wait minutes — or longer — between passes overhead, which is fine for “where’s my pallet?” and useless for anything needing a live feed. The full 60-satellite build-out that closes those gaps is a 2030 target, and satellites have a way of slipping their timelines and blowing their budgets.

There’s also physics to respect. Squeezing a usable signal out of a 50-cent chip across 400 miles works for a short burst of data; it does not turn Bluetooth into broadband. And Hubble is charging into a crowded orbit — SpaceX, Apple’s partner Globalstar, Skylo and others are all chasing direct-to-satellite connectivity, most with deeper pockets. Hubble’s bet is that owning the cheap-sensor niche beats fighting for smartphone users.

🎯 What Happens Next

The $200 million buys hardware. Hubble says its next-generation satellites — the first two slated for 2027 — will carry 10x more Bluetooth-detecting antennas and track more than 10 million devices each (Payload). Those birds are also meant to read more than location: Haro has talked up smoke and temperature alerts, plus agricultural data like CO2, humidity and soil moisture.

Watch three things. First, whether pilots like Samsara turn into volume contracts — a logo is not a purchase order. Second, launch cadence: 54 more satellites in four years is aggressive. Third, whether chipmakers bake Hubble support in by default, which is the flywheel that would make this unstoppable or, if it stalls, merely interesting.

đź§© Bigger Picture

For a decade, “connect everything” was the promise the Internet of Things kept failing to keep, mostly because connecting a cheap object cost more than the object. Hubble is attacking that from the cost side rather than the coverage side — make the radio nearly free and already ubiquitous, then point it at the sky. If it works at scale, the interesting question stops being “what can we afford to track?” and becomes “what’s left that we don’t?”

“Hubble Network has built the foundational infrastructure that the physical world is missing.” — Keith Block, Founder and CEO, Smith Point Capital

Whether that’s visionary or just a well-funded bet on physics behaving, the market just priced it at $1.6 billion. Not bad for a chip that was only ever supposed to talk to your headphones.


Sources