vs

OpenAI Codex vs Cursor

OpenAI Codex scores higher overall (8.7 vs 8.3), but the right pick depends on what you need.

Choose OpenAI Codex if…

Developers who want parallel, asynchronous tasks and pull requests back, bundled with ChatGPT

8.7/10★★★★★Full review →

Choose Cursor if…

IDE-first developers who want AI in every keystroke and the freedom to switch models

8.3/10★★★★★Full review →

Side by side

OpenAI CodexCursor
Overall score8.7/108.3/10
Rank in category#1 of 13#4 of 13
PriceFreemium · from $8/monthFreemium · from $20/month
Free versionQuick coding tasks on ChatGPT FreeHobby: free with limited agent requests
PlatformsWeb, iOS, VS Code, Terminal, Desktop appDesktop app, Terminal, Web
Made byOpenAIAnysphere (SpaceX)
Code quality98.5
Ease of use89
Features8.58.5
Value for money97.5
Platforms97.5

OpenAI Codex: what the AI does

  • Top CLI agent on Terminal-Bench 2.0
  • Low entry price, with free and $8 tiers
  • Many surfaces: web, CLI, IDE, desktop, iOS
  • Open-source CLI
  • Async cloud tasks add latency for quick edits
  • Only OpenAI models
  • Free and Go tiers get a lighter model

Cursor: what the AI does

  • Polished AI-first editor experience
  • Choice of frontier models
  • Strong review and cloud-agent tooling
  • VS Code extensions and keybindings carry over
  • Usage-based billing makes heavy agent use unpredictable
  • Its own Composer model scores far below the frontier models on Cursor's benchmark
  • New SpaceX ownership raises questions about model neutrality

See all 13 ranked ai coding assistants →