vs
Grammarly vs Rytr
Grammarly scores higher overall (8.6 vs 7.1), but the right pick depends on what you need.
Choose Grammarly if…
Anyone who wants polished, correct writing in every app without copying text into a separate tool
8.6/10★★★★★Full review →Choose Rytr if…
Small businesses and freelancers who need quick short-form copy cheaply
7.1/10★★★★★Full review →Side by side
| Grammarly | Rytr | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 8.6/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 | #9 of 10 |
| Price | Freemium · from $12/month | Freemium · from $7.50/month |
| Free version | Basic spelling, grammar and tone checks plus 100 AI prompts a month | 10,000 characters a month in one language |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Desktop app, Chrome extension, Microsoft Word, Google Docs | Web, Chrome extension |
| Made by | Superhuman (formerly Grammarly, Inc.) | Rytr |
| Writing quality | 8.5 | 6 |
| Ease of use | 9 | 8.5 |
| Features | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Value for money | 7.5 | 8 |
| Platforms | 10 | 5 |
Grammarly: what the AI does
- Real-time grammar, clarity and tone suggestions
- Full-sentence and paragraph rewrites
- Generative AI prompts for drafting and replies
- Plagiarism and AI-text detection
- Agents such as Citation Finder, AI Grader and Reader Reactions
- Superhuman Go assistant in the browser extension
- Works almost everywhere you type: browser, desktop, mobile keyboard, Word and Docs
- The most dependable grammar and clarity checks for English
- Free plan is genuinely useful
- Pro bundles plagiarism and AI-text detection
- Monthly billing ($30) is expensive compared with the annual price
- Its AI drafting is weaker than dedicated chatbots for long-form writing
- The extension reads everything you type, which raises privacy questions for some
Rytr: what the AI does
- 40+ copywriting templates
- 20+ tones and custom tone matching
- Autocomplete, expand and rephrase
- Plagiarism checker
- Very cheap paid plan with unlimited generations
- Simple template-based interface
- Useful free plan for occasional use
- Output quality is a tier below newer tools
- Weak for long-form or research-heavy writing
- No mobile apps or office integrations