vs

GitHub Copilot vs Cursor

GitHub Copilot scores higher overall (8.6 vs 8.3), but the right pick depends on what you need.

Choose GitHub Copilot if…

Developers and teams on GitHub who want AI in the IDE they already use, at the lowest entry price

8.6/10★★★★★Full review →

Choose Cursor if…

IDE-first developers who want AI in every keystroke and the freedom to switch models

8.3/10★★★★★Full review →

Side by side

GitHub CopilotCursor
Overall score8.6/108.3/10
Rank in category#2 of 13#4 of 13
PriceFreemium · from $10/monthFreemium · from $20/month
Free versionLimited chat and agent usage, including the CLI and agent modeHobby: free with limited agent requests
PlatformsWeb, iOS, VS Code, JetBrains, Terminal, Desktop app, OtherDesktop app, Terminal, Web
Made byGitHub (Microsoft)Anysphere (SpaceX)
Code quality7.58.5
Ease of use99
Features98.5
Value for money8.57.5
Platforms107.5

GitHub Copilot: what the AI does

  • Widest IDE coverage of any tool here
  • Lowest paid entry price ($10/month)
  • Built into GitHub issues, pull requests and code review
  • Can use several vendors' models and agents
  • Usage-based AI Credits make monthly costs harder to predict
  • Reviewers say its multi-file agent work trails Cursor and Claude Code
  • Free tier is small

Cursor: what the AI does

  • Polished AI-first editor experience
  • Choice of frontier models
  • Strong review and cloud-agent tooling
  • VS Code extensions and keybindings carry over
  • Usage-based billing makes heavy agent use unpredictable
  • Its own Composer model scores far below the frontier models on Cursor's benchmark
  • New SpaceX ownership raises questions about model neutrality

See all 13 ranked ai coding assistants →